Sunday, November 23, 2008

Bob's Books: Neruda and the everyday

Editor's note: Bob's Books is an exciting new addition to The Saylavee Times. From time to time, Bob will be discussing various books and authors for the enjoyment of our readers.

As I navigated the tight aisle in coach I looked at my assigned seat and saw that the seat next to mine was already occupied. I tried to convince myself that it was ok (to be honest, my thought process was something along the lines of “great… I hope that lady isn’t wearing too much perfume and doesn’t try to steal my armrest). When I got to the seat, I tried to smile; it did not work very well. Noticing that she was Latina—and having just spent the week in Honduras—I involuntarily greeted her in Spanish, “¿Como esta?” She replied warmly, “Muy bien, gracias.”

I sat down and claimed my armrest. A simple turn of the head which probably appeared to be a glance out the window, was really a stealthy olfactory investigation to see if my allergies were going to suffer from a perfume-bomb… *sniff* *sniff*… nope, no perfume. Looks to be a good flight. Then I saw it: she was holding Cien Anos de Solidad­ (One Hundred Years of Solitude) by Gabriel Garcia Marquez, and that changed everything.

This brings me to my inaugural “Bob’s Books” entry. In the course of our discussion, my Bolivian friend asked me who my favorite Latino writer was. The choice was easy: Pablo Neruda. During the mid-1950’s his poetry moved from the political to odes of the simple and common. An English poetic form made most famous British Romantics like Wordsworth, Coleridge, Keats, and Shelly, odes traditionally sought to praise the extraordinary, to acknowledge the superior nature of things, and to remind all of the glory an object holds. Yet Neruda’s odes changed all this. Rather than praising the Grecian Urn, a Nightingale, or Melancholy, Neruda chose as the subject matter of his odes the common things of life: socks, salt, clothes, cats, tomatoes, and wine.

Many of Neruda’s odes were published in collections of poetry like, Odas elementales (Elemental Odes) (1954), Nuevas Odas Elementales (New Elemental Odes) (1956) and Navegaciones y regresos (Voyages and Homecoming); however his odes are easily accessible on the internet (just search for “Neruda Odes”). It was partly this recognition of the glory of everyday objects—the way he turned the snobbish ode on its head—that won him the Nobel Prize in 1971. More importantly however, his “odes to the every day” remind us all how wonderful the little things in life really are.

In “Ode to My Socks,” Neruda tells of receiving a pair of handmade wool socks. After receiving this gift, the narrator says: “I slipped / my feet into them / as if / into / jewel cases / woven / with threads of / dusk / and sheep's wool.” He gazed at these “celestial socks” and with satisfaction notes: “They were / so beautiful / that for the first time / my feet seemed / unacceptable to me.” Similarly, in “Ode to Salt” Neruda sees not just a common seasoning. Instead, he experiences it through all his senses, and examines the mystery of salt’s origin. He imagines, “In its caves / the salt moans” and sees it as a “mountain / of buried light, / translucent cathedral, / crystal of the sea, oblivion / of the waves.” Tasting the salt, he notes, “Dust of the sea, in you / the tongue receives a kiss / from ocean night.”

Out of a seemingly banal thing, Neruda finds the extraordinary; out of the singular object, he identifies the universal. These are things that all people share—regardless of where you live, who runs your country, and what God you worship (if you worship a God at all). Since all people share these banal and singular objects, we also all share the extraordinary and universal commonalities associated with these objects. It is in enjoyment of socks and salt, Neruda seems to argue, that we find the seeds of humanity and peace.

It is through the humanity of literature that I found common ground with a woman from Bolivia. Though we had very little in common, our brief discussion on the literary merit of Marquez and other Latino writers led to a much longer dialogue on family, friends, and home. This is what literature can do. Thoughtfully placed words cross all ethnic, gender, and political lines. Literature can expose those universalities with which all humans can identify; words are, perhaps the most ordinary part of human existence, and yet they have the ability to bind the entire human race. Neruda’s final thoughts on salt could equally apply to the miraculous power of language: “the smallest, / miniature / wave from the saltcellar / reveals to us / more than domestic whiteness; / in it, we taste infinitude.”

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Kirby: Too many families feud over turkey

The Salt Lake Tribune
Updated: 11/18/2008 03:44:52 PM MST

Robert Kirby: Years ago when I was a cop, Thanksgiving was my least favorite holiday to work. The reason was entirely selfish -- I didn't want to get bitten, slugged or covered in mincemeat.

Working Christmas was understandably tough. It meant that I missed opening gifts with the kids. Patrol on New Year's was bad because the collective IQ of the entire human race drops 50 points as midnight approaches. Halloween sucked for obvious reasons.

I hated working Thanksgiving because it's the one holiday devoted to bringing people together -- people who really shouldn't be within a hundred miles of each other for the rest of their lives.

I am, of course, talking about families. Domestic dispute calls were bad enough during the rest of the year. Frankly, nobody fights like couples who have gotten on each other's last #%$* nerve.

Family fight calls on Thanksgiving were worse. Not only was there the added stress of a holiday, but also the fact that reinforcements for the opposing sides were already at the scene.

It's bad enough when couples fight. Toss in assorted cousins, drunken uncles, crazy aunts, in-laws, bitter siblings and unwelcome significant others, and what you have then isn't a family fight so much as a riot with all the trimmings.

Maybe that's why even today when asked what I'm most thankful for on Thanksgiving, the first thing that comes to mind is always tear gas.

Not all families have issues this big, but all families have issues.

Unfortunately these issues are rarely taken into account by the person in charge of family togetherness: generally the most overly optimistic and clueless member.

With just a little advance preparation, it's possible to have a Thanksgiving dinner where the turkey is the only thing that gets overheated.

Location, as they say, is everything. It's a good idea to put as much of this as possible between two family members with known conflicts: if not the county line, then at least the length of the table.

Set up tables at opposite ends of the house for Republicans and Democrats. It might even be a good idea to serve the Libertarians out in the garage. Do not seat your Proposition 8-supporting brother directly across the table from your uncle and his new husband.

Family members who owe each other money should not be permitted to dine at the same table with anything sharper than a spoon at their disposal.

Finally, Thanksgiving is largely regarded as a holiday based on freedom of religion. However, family dinner should not be considered a good time to pester other people with yours, particularly if you've been doing it for years and it hasn't worked.

What else? Oh, yeah. Make sure the fattest person in the family is never left alone with the pies.

Robert Kirby is a columnist. Reach him at rkirby@sltrib.com

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Simple Inquisition Turns Ugly

A four-year-old boy unknowingly insulted his mother today while eating lunch.

Buzz, the only son of Helen, reportedly compared his mother to swine during their usual lunchtime conversation.

"It is always an adventure to talk with Buzz," Helen says, "He has a very big imagination and spends most of his days telling tales about Transformers or battling imaginary bad guys and saving the day."

This particular conversation started with Buzz quizzing Helen about the eating habits of his one-year-old sister Maggie.

"Buzz asks a lot of questions," said Helen. "Today he started asking about the foods that Maggie used to eat when she was a baby. He wanted to know if she still eats the same foods. I told him she eats more foods now than she used to. He then asked about her drinking milk as a baby and was asking if she still drank that milk. I told him she drinks the same milk he does now because she is bigger."

Helen states that when Maggie was a baby and was breastfed that Buzz always said the milk came from her belly and that was how she fed Maggie.

"I see no reason to explain the mechanics of breastfeeding to a child his age so the whole milk from the belly thing was a perfectly good explanation that he came up with himself," said Helen.

According to Helen, the conversation then progressed as follows:

(Buzz) "Did you get sick of feeding Maggie?"
(Helen) "No, I didn't get sick of feeding her, she just got bigger and stopped drinking my milk."
(Buzz) "Do you still have your milk?"
(Helen) "No, it went away when she stopped drinking it."
(Buzz) "Well, why is your stomach still big?"
(Helen) "What?"
(Buzz) "Why is your stomach still big?"
(Helen) "I don't know, buddy."
(Buzz) "Pigs' stomachs are big. So are their backs."

The boy then reportedly got on all fours and imitated a pig by making snorting noises.

"I know he didn't mean to compare me to a pig, but I plan on remembering this conversation for many years to come so that I can remind him of it when he is a teenager," Helen said. "I think I will go do some sit-ups now."